From Preferences to Judgments and Back
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper studies the interrelationships of the Preference Aggregation and Judgment Aggregation problems from the point of view of logical semantics. The result of the paper is twofold. On the one hand, the Preference Aggregation problem is viewed as a special case of the Judgment Aggregation one. On the other hand, the Judgment Aggregation problem is viewed as a special case of the Preference Aggregation one. It is shown how to import an impossibility result from each framework to the other.
منابع مشابه
ELECTRE I-based group decision methodology with risk preferences in an imprecise setting for flexible manufacturing systems
A new hesitant fuzzy set (HFS)-ELECTRE for multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) problems is developed in this paper. In real-world applications, the decision makers (DMs)’ opinions are often hesitant for decision problems; thus, considering the exact data is difficult. To address the issue, the DMs’ judgments can be expressed as linguistic variables that are converted into the HFSs, con...
متن کاملNonlinear Multi attribute Satisfaction Analysis (N-MUSA): Preference disaggregation approach to satisfaction
Nonlinear MUSA is an extension of MUSA, which employs a derived approach to analyze customer satisfaction and its determinants. It is a preference disaggregation approach, widely welcomed by scholars since 2002, following the principles of ordinal regression analysis. N-MUSA as a goal programing model, evaluates the level of satisfaction among some groups including customers, employees, etcete...
متن کاملCS 674 / INFO 630 : Advanced Language Technologies Fall 2007
At the end of the previous lecture we were talking about how to incorporate implicit relevance feedback which came in the form of preferences, i.e. instead of absolute judgments (this document is relevant and that document is not) we had information from clickthrough data in the form of relative judgments (this document is more relevant than that document). We ended up with some sort of vector ...
متن کاملOptionality and Gradience in Persian Phonology: An Optimality Treatment
The distribution of the allophones of /?/in certain contexts involves free variation and gradient preferences. An organized survey was conducted to elicit the judgments of 37 native Persian speakers concerning the well-formedness of /?/allophonic behavior in five different phonological positions. The results showed that the differences in judgment between the various categories are not just t...
متن کاملSIGIR WORKSHOP REPORT Beyond Binary Relevance: Preferences, Diversity, and Set-Level Judgments
In most information retrieval or filtering applications, assessor judgments form the cornerstone of system evaluation. These judgments are critical when comparing systems or training ranking algorithms. Other “judgments” such as clicks, relevance feedback or ratings are also used for tuning and selection of ranking algorithms, and more broadly for user modeling, evaluating presentation techniqu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008